diff --git a/paper/aaai/rebuttal.pdf b/paper/aaai/rebuttal.pdf
index 992549af807faa67d385c4ba29336ddb1fc1bf6a..67f166ef7e7365aaad91eaf828936ba8c4845c8f 100644
Binary files a/paper/aaai/rebuttal.pdf and b/paper/aaai/rebuttal.pdf differ
diff --git a/paper/aaai/rebuttal.tex b/paper/aaai/rebuttal.tex
index 1ddb4db9a2e0a6b07a359a28cad2ab159db8526f..6c22c14b343dfe74192b50af64c54db8b6b85052 100644
--- a/paper/aaai/rebuttal.tex
+++ b/paper/aaai/rebuttal.tex
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ To facilitate comprehension, we will follow the reviewer's advice and add a syst
 
 \subsubsection{4. Why use an embedding?}
 
-There are two main reasons for using a low-dimensional latent embedding: firstly, to help with plausibility and, secondly, to reduce computational costs. The latter is not currently made explicit in the paper and we will add this in Section 5. The former is discussed in the context of the results for \textit{ECCCo+} in Section 6.3, but we will highlight the following rationale. 
+There are two main reasons for using a low-dimensional latent embedding: firstly, to help with plausibility and, secondly, to reduce computational costs. The latter is not currently made explicit in the paper and we will add this in Section 5. The former is discussed in the context of the results for \textit{ECCCo+} in Section 6.3, but we will highlight the following rationale:
 
 There is indeed a tradeoff between plausibility and faithfulness through the introduction of bias: plausibility is improved because counterfactuals are insensitive to variation captured by higher-order principal components. Intuitively, the generated counterfactuals are therefore less noisy. We think that the bias introduced by PCA may be acceptable, precisely because it `will not add any information on the input distribution' as the reviewer correctly points out. To maintain faithfulness, we want to avoid adding any information through surrogate models as much as possible.